Mobile
Recent Comments
Re: “North Carolina's vague cyberstalking law makes it difficult for victims”
Suppose the following scenario occurs; Person A initiates email correspondence with Person B, whom Person A found on the Internet and even though Person B is not out to harm Person A or anyone else and has never threatened Person A or anyone else nevertheless, Person A changes Person A’s email address without telling Person B what Person A’s current email address is thus Person B has no way to contact Person A, Person A never told Person B to stop sending Person A email or not to contact Person A through Facebook or any other social media, and Person A never told Person B what Person B did wrong that Person A no longer wants anything to do with Person B anymore like Person A used to do. Person B sends email to people whom Person A had contacted by means of CC and/or whom Person A knows and Person B tells these people the fact that Person B is worried about Person A, asks these people if Person A is alright, tells these people the fact that Person B hopes that Person A is alright, and asks these people to ask Person A to contact Person B. Why do the laws designate these behaviors done by Person B as stalking, cyberstalking, and/or harassment in spite of the fact that Person B is not out to harm Person A or anyone else and has never threatened Person A or anyone else?
Also, what can Person B do to prove the fact that Person B is not out to harm Person A or anyone else and has never threatened Person A or anyone else?
Furthermore, I have created a petition on the matter and here is the link to the petition; https://www.change.org/p/u-s-house-of-representatives-us-senate-stop-branding-harmless-people-as-stalkers-cyberstalkers-and-harassers
Please reply.
