http://clclt.com/EverybodyLovesBaby/archives/2012/05/08/amendment-one-a-christian-moms-perspective Comments On: Amendment One: A Christian mom's perspective by Ailen Arreaza en-us Copyright 2013 Creative Loafing Charlotte. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Creative Loafing Charlotte readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Creative Loafing Charlotte. charlotteonline@cln.com (Creative Loafing Charlotte Webmaster) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:15:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Santa Fe New Mexican
Looking In: Marriage views not off-limits for businesses

By | The New Mexican

2/27/2012
Santa Fe hairdresser Antonio Darden decided he can no longer in good conscience cut the hair of Gov. Susana Martinez because she does not support redefining marriage to include same-sex couples.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:31:55 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by AGreene]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 20:06:06 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
I did state the following: "It is the responsibility of the parent to teach their children to treat other people with respect, not the school."

I in no way suggested any parent should teach a child disrespect or allow or encourage them to be a bully. But...it does happen.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 15:22:36 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
1. If the parent reacts to anything in school curricula in a manner that would encourage their children to bully another child, they need to seriously reconsider whether they have any business being parents.
Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 14:19:30 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
Children who are bullies are typically the result of bad parenting. Teaching the GLBT agenda in schools is not going to resolve this issue.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 12:52:54 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
It appears you did not read the last link I posted. I will post an excerpt here from:

http://www.therightscoop.com/gay-rights-vs…

"Another example of this is when Catholic Charities was sued for not allowing gay and lesbian couples to adopt children from their agency.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 12:38:57 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 11:44:09 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by DLP]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 09:49:19 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
If two heterosexual atheists get married by a town Justice or a Judge, is that a slap in the face of religion? Would you support an amendment to deny them the right to marry?

Face it marriage has nothing to do with religion.
Posted by DLP]]> Sun, 13 May 2012 09:05:52 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
I have discussed some situations where gay marriage has infringed upon religious freedom. I am not going to take the time to produce a list for you to dismiss them out of hand because you have judged them as unimportant.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Sat, 12 May 2012 22:29:36 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Sat, 12 May 2012 13:23:03 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
You say that I want to exclude one religion (never mind that said religion is, in fact, my own), while you seem to be willing to include only one religion. He who among you who is without sin, let him cast the first stone.
Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Sat, 12 May 2012 13:13:58 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by cuulblu]]> Sat, 12 May 2012 12:07:25 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Sat, 12 May 2012 06:43:31 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by cuulblu]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 23:44:54 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 22:27:02 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 22:20:00 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 21:47:08 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
You are misinterpreting the intent of the article. It is addressed to the issue of a gay/lesbian couple who within a committed closed relationship do not have the ability to have children.
Posted by cuulblu]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 21:02:53 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 20:59:50 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by cuulblu]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 20:44:20 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte That article is the most biased, most nonsensical piece of flimflam that I have read in... well, it is an election year, so there's more flimflam floating around than usual, but the most biased and nonsensical that I've read in the past couple of months, at any rate. For the record, National Review is an INCREDIBLY biased source (even moreso than Fox News, IMNSHO), to the point that some high school debate judges will call you out if you dare cite it in a speech.

No one is arguing about whether gays and lesbians are permitted to live together - of course they are, this isn't the Victorian era!
Posted by Allison Rose Warn]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 16:04:47 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte
For the record, you're WRONG. Google it!
Posted by CallingThemOut]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 13:58:04 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by aarreaza]]> Fri, 11 May 2012 00:09:06 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte Posted by cuulblu]]> Thu, 10 May 2012 21:15:41 -0400 Creative Loafing Charlotte