Mobile
Recent Comments
Re: “Top 10 things (plus a bonus) that are good for you now but will kill you in 20 years”
This article would have been interesting if it actually revealed long term problems that could potentially be caused by things we currently consider "good" for us. Since it doesn't, I think it's safe to assume the authors were merely aiming for humor. They failed. "Cracked.com" has factually correct (for the most part, anyway) lists that actually evoke laughter; I recommend heading over there if this didn't do anything for you.
Posted by
TexasTrojan
on 08/09/2012 at 10:37 AM
Re: “Top 10 things (plus a bonus) that are good for you now but will kill you in 20 years”
Sean Nguyen, you might want to pick up that book on grammar as well; it's "had to have failed", not "had to of failed".
Posted by
TexasTrojan
on 08/09/2012 at 10:28 AM
