THE HOUSE WITH A CLOCK IN ITS WALLS
*1/2 (out of four)
DIRECTED BY Eli Roth
STARS Jack Black, Cate Blanchett

Jack Black, Cate Blanchett and Owen Vaccaro in The House with a Clock in Its Walls (Photo: Universal)

On the literary timeline, the source material for the new kid flick The House with a Clock in Its Walls existed long before Harry Potter received a letter offering him a chance to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. But on the cinematic timeline, this adaptation of John Bellairsโ€™ 1973 childrenโ€™s novel arrives long after the magic has largely dissipated from such enterprises. While the celluloid version of J.K. Rowlingโ€™s Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them offered enough invention and energy to bode well for the upcoming follow-up, everything in Clock moves at the pace of, well, a clock winding down. Itโ€™s both too-little-too-late and been-there-done-that.

Set in 1955, the movie centers on Lewis Barnavelt (Owen Vaccaro), a young boy whoโ€™s sent to live with his eccentric uncle Jonathan (Jack Black) after his parents are killed in a car crash. Jonathanโ€™s home is a cluttered mansion once owned by the late Isaac Izard (Kyle MacLachlan), an evil warlock who left a ticking clock hidden somewhere on the premises. Jonathan, whoโ€™s also revealed to be a warlock (albeit a good one), knows that the clock represents something malevolent, so he and Florence Zimmerman (Cate Blanchett), his next-door neighbor and fellow sorcerer, spend much of their time frantically searching for it. Wowed by everything heโ€™s witnessing, Lewis decides that he would like to become a warlock as well.

Best known for Cabin Fever and Hostel, Eli Roth has spent 2018 trying to reinvent himself as a filmmaker who can tackle other genres in addition to horror. He started the year with the needless Death Wish remake and now returns with a PG-rated family film thatโ€™s somehow even more dreary and repetitive than that R-rated effort. For a movie about fantastic beasts and where to find them, The House with a Clock in Its Walls offers little in the way of wonder and imagination. The incessant CGI maintains a constant chokehold on most other aspects of the film, as if Roth felt that todayโ€™s kids can only respond to a nonstop barrage of sound and fury and busy effects. The doll army is admittedly creepy โ€” one can easily picture them as Pennywiseโ€™s minions โ€” but a little of the canine-like chair, the belching pumpkins, and the perpetually crapping topiary griffin goes a long way. Even the sight of Blackโ€™s head on an infantโ€™s body runs a distant second to the more accomplished trick of placing Ryan Reynoldsโ€™ noggin on an itty bitty body in the recent Deadpool 2.

After Goosebumps, Black doubtless seemed like a sound choice for this project, and heโ€™s perfectly suited for his role as a voluble man whose surface cheeriness masks his inner frustrations and fears. But Blanchett never quite comes into her own in whatโ€™s ultimately a rather blasรฉ role, and while the idea of having Black and Blanchett constantly hurling affectionate insults at each other sounds delightful, their barbs rarely extend beyond tiresome variations of โ€œYouโ€™re uglyโ€ and โ€œYouโ€™re fat.โ€

Clearly, Universal Pictures and Roth are trying to pay homage to the Amblin films made by Steven Spielberg and cohorts back in the 1980s โ€“ the studioโ€™s press release even states that the film is โ€œin the tradition of Amblin classics where fantastical events occur in the most unexpected places.โ€ But if this soulless slog is any indication of what to expect from future Amblin wannabes, then weโ€™re all in trouble, as it isnโ€™t Back to the Future as much as itโ€™s bleak for the future.

Related Stories

Matt Brunson is Film Editor, Arts & Entertainment Editor and Senior Editor for Creative Loafing Charlotte. He's been with the alternative newsweekly since 1988, initially as a freelance film critic before...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *