Many local Catholics, myself included, were startled by a recent issue of the Catholic News Herald. A bright red circle-with-a-slash symbol appeared over a photo of a crucifix, along with the headline, “Catholic Identity Under Siege.” Inside the local publication, articles urged area Catholics to oppose gay marriage, and a column by Bishop Peter Jugis of the Charlotte Diocese warned of “an alarming and serious matter … that strikes at the fundamental right to religious liberty.”

Jugis was referring to the new federal regulations that mandate free contraception coverage in all employers’ health plans. President Obama, reacting to criticism from the nation’s Catholic bishops, changed the regulation so that insurers, rather than the church, will foot the bill. Some Catholic groups were satisfied with the compromise, but the bishops say the rules, in Jugis’ words, still represent a “severe assault on religious liberty.”

The column seemed to be the culmination of Jugis’ steady swing to the far right. The bishop showed his doctrinal conservatism in 2006 when he told priests who planned to wash parishioners’ feet during Holy Thursday that they should only wash men’s feet. Jugis stepped into anti-gay territory when he opposed the School Violence Protection Act, which requires schools to adopt strong policies against bullying and harassment, including bullying based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Jugis now forcefully supports N.C.’s proposed anti-gay marriage amendment.

Some critics say if these Catholic bishops have their way on what they frame as an issue of religious liberty, it will be an infringement on the liberty of non-Catholic women who work for Catholic employers and want contraception coverage. Salon.com‘s Joan Walsh, who is Catholic, argues that the majority of adult U.S. Catholics use birth control despite the Vatican’s dictates, and that the bishops don’t represent regular Catholics’ views. Their actions, Walsh says, are a veiled political fight rather than a defense of religion.

David Hains, the Charlotte Diocese’s communications director, says those arguments don’t hold water: “Women who work for Catholic institutions have never had access to contraception through their health insurance, so the argument that their liberties are being denied is a bit of a leap of faith.” Hains is correct that North Carolina’s insurance mandates exempt religious institutions from contraception coverage. Several other states, however, do not offer exemptions, and Catholic employers in those states have been providing contraception coverage.

As for Walsh’s argument that most Catholics use contraception, Hains says Jugis and the other bishops are making a religious statement. “The Catholic Church teaches that it’s not part of God’s plan for humans to use contraception,” Hains says. “It’s not a popularity contest; God doesn’t allow us to take a vote when he reveals his truth to us.”

More truth was revealed to local Catholics recently when a gay music minister at St. Gabriel’s was fired, a move widely believed to be at Jugis’ urging. Catholic liberals are not happy campers, particularly considering Jugis’ support of the proposed anti-same sex marriage amendment. His position is a turnaround from what Charlotte Catholics were previously accustomed to.

Marco Cipolletti heads the Diocesan Ministry for Gay and Lesbian Catholics at St. Peter’s. The ministry was set up in 1996 by the parish’s late vicar, the Rev. Gene McCreesh, with the help of former Bishop William Curlin. Things have changed since then. After an August 2011 celebratory mass at St. Peter’s for LGBT Catholics, one priest, who was not from St. Peter’s, openly worried whether Jugis had sent “spies.” Cipolletti says he and other DMGLC members met with Jugis soon after the bishop was installed. “Bishop Jugis permits us to continue, which is something, but he’s not actively supportive,” says Cipolletti.

The current Catholic battles date back to the huge changes of the 1960s and ’70s after Vatican II. Jugis is a product of conservative Catholicism’s reaction against Vatican II’s liberalization. That reaction was bolstered by Pope John Paul II, who crammed the ranks of bishops and cardinals with conservatives who today are trying to roll back time to the ’50s.

The passage of time, however, is working against Vatican conservatism. In the modern world, particularly in the U.S., with its deep traditions of individualism, old-school blind obedience doesn’t sit well with many Catholics. Sure, the “obedient sheep” model of Catholicism is still alive here, but to an increasing number of Catholics, demands for uniformity by the Vatican, and by its hand-picked conservative messengers like Jugis, seem medieval. I would add “irrelevant,” but that’s why I’m a “lapsed” Catholic.

Image Credit: About.com

John Grooms is a multiple award-winning writer and editor, teacher, public speaker, event organizer, cultural critic, music history buff and incurable smartass. He writes the Boomer With Attitude column,...

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

  1. Well, you see, Tim, that’s what happens in a political column – the writer is paid to have an opinion and share it. That kind of thing has been going on in newspapers for over 200 years. Thought you’d like to be kept up to date.

  2. Why did John Grooms wait to the end of the piece to clarify he’s a “lapsed Catholic”? He makes mention that Salon.com‘s Joan Walsh is also Catholic. Part of the problem in the debates about the HHS mandate, the redefinition of marriage and abortion is the constant opinion of so called “Catholics”. I tend to think of it as on par with Taco Bell being authentically Mexican. Taco Bell may play to the image and have a Chihuahua on their ads, a Hispanic person with a new meal, but ask any real Mexican or Hispanic about their food and they’ll tell you “ah, that ain’t Mexican, or that ain’t Hispanic”. The “Chinese food” we eat is something you will not really see in China or most Chinese eat, it’s an American “idea of Chinese food”. John Grooms, Joan Walsh, Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Sebelius, Joe Biden, etc are not REAL CATHOLICS they are only an “idea of Catholics”. If you do not believe the Catholic Church was instituted by Jesus Christ and has authority, the Pope has authority and is the vicar of Christ, the only place for sex is in a marriage between a man and a woman (anything else is a mortal sin), contraception is a mortal sin because it is a deliberate rejection of the life giving aspect of sex, the Real Presence etc, then guess what? YOU’RE NOT CATHOLIC! Being baptized in the Catholic Church, attending Mass weekly or every now and then, being in a ministry, etc, those things are PART of Catholicism, but by far not the core of it, especially if you don’t BELIEVE! So please, be sincere and honest. To say you’re Catholic but support infanticide, redefining marriage to accommodate persons with same-sex attraction, sex divorced from the natural law is about as ridiculous as a Vegan who eats animal flesh and dairy but calls himself vegan because he sometimes doesn’t eat meat and has a vegan book and attended a few of their meetings. John Grooms, please be sincere and honest with yourself first so you can be so with others. If you do not believe the teachings of the Catholic Church, then you’re not Catholic. It kills me how people can believe certain teachings and doctrines of the Catholic Church are wrong and evil BUT STILL CALL THEMSELVES CATHOLIC! What???? Are you serious? In a country where there are thousands of Christian church’s with different beliefs, different religions or no religion, you continue to sit and be part of an institution that you believe to be heavily flawed. Where are your principles? Do you have any?

  3. Carlotta:

    As another person who was born and raised Catholic, attended a Catholic school, and served as an alter boy, before realizing… well, before “losing the faith”, as the Nuns used to describe it…

    The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion. That doesn’t apply to churches, it applies to EVERYONE. It does not guarantee the church the right to enforce their teachings, it guarantees everyone the right to follow or not their own religions path as they see fit. The Affordable Care Act, Obama Care for those of you who think Fox is news, guarantees certain medical care for INDIVIDUALS. It is not up to your employer to determine whether or not he thinks you deserve one section or another. If you are a Catholic, and don’t believe in birth control, then don’t use birth control. If the Catholic Church want’s to employ only Catholics, as long as they are not getting Government funds, it is their right to do so.

    It is not freedom of religion for the church to say “I don’t believe in it, so YOU may not do it”.

  4. DLP :

    The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion,
    (meaning neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church),
    or impeding the free exercise of religion.
    ( the First Amendment would not protect the practice of human sacrifice – abortion, even if some religion required it. In other words, while the freedom to believe is absolute, the freedom to act on those beliefs is not).
    So its not OK for the church to say “YOU may not do it”, but it is OK for the government to say to the church “YOU will do it”.

  5. Error has no rights. Error includes contraception, gay marriage, abortion, and more. These are interferences with God’s plan, which directly oppose God’s law of the 10 Commandments, which are in changeable Truth. Truth is true no matter how many people believe it. Truth applies to secular laws in that the common good (which comes from God) should be protected. Truth applies to every man and woman, all of whom are made in God’s image and likeness. You don’t have to like the Truth, who is Jesus Christ, but know that He is the ultimate good. Only through taking on His yoke, which is easy and light, do we have any hope for Eternal Life.

    “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8) Truth is unchangeable. Submit to the will of the Father before the gates of Hell consume you!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *