Worker helps assemble trucks at GM's Fort Wayne, Ind. plant (photo pickuptrucks.com)

It is often astonishing what the mainstream media chooses to cover or not cover. A case in point is the recent news from General Motors. Considering the flaming, angry uproar that greeted Pres. Obama’s plan to bail out GM, you’d think the concrete results of the bailout, two years later, would be really big news. But no. A few stories were written, and maybe a grand total of three minutes on network newscasts were given to the bailout’s now-obvious success.

In case you didn’t hear about it — or heard FoxNews’ usual La-La Land distortions about it — GM is experiencing a rebirth, and recently made its initial public offering of stock. As ThinkProgress reports, the federal government’s ownership in GM has now been cut in half; billions in bailout money has been returned to the government; and a total exit by the government will probably take place within two years. In the meantime, tens of thousands of jobs were saved, and a variety of industries were kept solvent, including the many companies that sell parts and services to GM.

As you may recall, however, when the GM bailout was proposed, conservatives nearly had a stroke, solemnly declaring to all and sundry that the GM bailout was (naturally) “socialism,” an evil government takeover of private property, part of Obama’s “war on capitalism,” and “destined to be a predictable failure.” (See the ThinkProgress story to identify the authors of those quotes, and more).

The vapid, kneejerk cries of “socialism” from critics who don’t have the slightest clue regarding what they’re yapping about is something we’ve almost grown used to. Sad to say, with the GOP now in control of the House, we’ll no doubt hear the same crabby ignorance a lot in the next two years. The truth, however, at least where the GM bailout is concerned, is that, according to the Center for Automotive Research, “if the government had not invested in the automotive industry, up to 80,000 automotive jobs would have been lost, and General Motors alone would have lost one million units of sales in 2009.” In addition, 53,000 workers have been added to GM’s rolls since July ’09. And the bailout money is being paid back, and people’s jobs were saved, and on and on. That’s the kind of thing smartly run governments do in emergency situations. As usual, the GOP came down on the side of panic and pessimism instead. Their constant attacks on government actions to save jobs, and their belief that the government can’t do anything right, is understandable in a way; they’re not used to government competence during GOP administrations. As author P.J. O’Rourke (who is Republican), wrote in his book Parliament of Whores, “Republicans say government doesn’t work. Then they get elected and prove it.”

Worker helps assemble trucks at GM’s Fort Wayne, Ind. plant (photo pickuptrucks.com)

John Grooms is a multiple award-winning writer and editor, teacher, public speaker, event organizer, cultural critic, music history buff and incurable smartass. He writes the Boomer With Attitude column,...

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AB43H20101118?pageNumber=2

    At $33 a share, the partial sale represents a loss of about $9 billion on taxpayers’ original investment, assuming the extra shares go at the same price.

    To break even on the bailout, the Treasury would have to average near $52 per share on its remaining stock sales, more than 50 percent above GM stock’s closing price on Thursday. GM shares gained 3.6 percent to close at $34.19, trimming gains from an earlier high at $35.99.

    (P.S.: The $7.4 billion TARP “repayment” GM made in April did not come from earnings, it came from a separate TARP fund).

    (P.P.S.: The projections of “units lost” and “jobs saved” assume that the shuttering of GM would not have resulted in customers purchasing vehicles from other companies, and those companies hiring former GM workers due to their increased business.)

    (P.P.P.S.: Also from the Reuters article: “The IPO is set to generate up to $273.6 million in underwriting fees”. Goldman Sachs makes millions, taxpayers get the shaft.)

  2. JQP, GM will be issuing more stock along the way, also, so I think it is clear now that we, the taxpayers will be made whole, regardless if the current stock gets to $53 or not.

    P.S. The tarp loan was paid back from GM’s escrow account, which held the TARP loan funds. When it was obvious they wouldn’t need it for liquidity purposes, they gave it back. The negative hype about it, was just hype, and we earned $750 million in interest on the transaction.

    P.S.S. Fees must be paid(1.2%, big deal!!). That is a fact. However taxpayers will be made whole. GM has no choice. They can’t live with the stigma of shorting the public and want to be totally free from government as soon as possible..

  3. Detfan,

    Additional stock has to be issued at the market price. You can’t sell new shares at $40/share if the stock is trading at $35. And you don’t want to issue shares that exceed the market capitalization of the company – that’s called “dilution” and drives the stock price down.

    P.S.: Here is the statement of Neil Barofsky, Special Treasury Department Inspector General for TARP, regarding GM’s “repayment”:

    “I think the one thing that a lot of people overlook with this is where they got the money to pay back the loan. And it isn’t from earnings. It’s actually from another pool of TARP money that they’ve already received. I don’t think we should exaggerate it too much. Remember that the source of this money is just other TARP money.”

    P.P.S.: “The stigma of shorting the public”? Whatever happened to the left’s reflexive distrust of corporations?

  4. How about lost interest? Has this been calculated into the repayment as well?

    It has been quite a while since GM was bailed out and it will be quite a while before they pay everything back, if they do. I’m pretty sure it has not. Further there has been quite a bit of inflation by the fed since then so there’s another factor not considered.

    The State itself is socialism…

  5. The GOP has been wrong in almost every stand they have taken for many many years. It is primarily because every stand they have taken has been motivated solely by the urge to fight with anyone who does not agree with them. They seldom consider facts, they just consider political advantage.

    If a Democrat or an Independent said the sky is blue, the right wing echo chamber would start a nonstop media blitz, complete with a little gaggle of Republicans standing around a microphone in a circle, ranting that it is a socialist plot to undermine life as we know it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *