Leaders of the Republican Party in North Carolina are pressuring state Attorney General Roy Cooper to join the lawsuits brought by 14 other state AG’s to stop implementation of health care reform. On top of that, some N.C. GOP leaders say they’ll introduce legislation to “exempt North Carolina from Obamacare,” as N.C. Senate Minority Leader Phil Berger put it.
This isn’t the first time the GOP has tried to derail major legislation in these ways. Similar efforts were launched after Congress passed federal unemployment insurance and Social Security in the 1930s, and Medicare in the ‘60s. The same arguments being used today to dislodge health care reform were roundly rejected in those earlier cases, and there’s no real reason to think the current lawsuits, legislation and general huffing and puffing and bluster will be any more successful.
The 14 AG’s are asking federal courts to rule that the health care reform law is unconstitutional. They claim the law’s mandates violate the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, and also violate state sovereignty by coercing states to set up insurance exchanges, expand Medicaid coverage, and so forth.
As has been ruled over and over in the courts, this particular Commerce Clause argument is nonsense. As Wake Forest Law Professor Mark Hall pointed out to NC Policy Watch’s Chris Fitzsimon, the argument “is flawed because, legally, the mandate is basically a ‘tax for the general welfare.’”
As for the “state sovereignty” argument, Hall explains, the new law doesn’t technically require states to participate in either Medicaid or the new insurance exchanges, as citizens can always opt to use the federal exchange. In Fitzsimon’s article, Hall goes on to quote Harvard’s Charles Fried, who was Solicitor General for Pres. Reagan: “It’s like Virginia saying we don’t have to pay income tax…One is left speechless by the absurdity of it.”
Several state Attorneys General have said they have no intention of joining the lawsuits, including Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray, who said he doesn’t believe the lawsuits “have any legal merit whatsoever,” and that pursuing one for his state “would be a waste of taxpayer resources.”
As for Phil Berger’s arguments that North Carolina could “opt out” of federal laws, well, not to put too fine a point on it, but wasn’t there a civil war or something fought over that kind of thing? Even before the Civil War, South Carolina (of course) espoused the idea that any state could “nullify” a federal law within its borders; it’s an argument that didn’t sit well with Pres. Andrew Jackson, who threatened to send U.S. troops to enforce the laws if necessary. South Carolina backed down. That time. In the modern era, the nullification argument has as much credence as belief in the existence of unicorns. We knew the right is drifting farther and farther into fantasy land, but Berger seems determined to prove it.
Attorney General Cooper hasn’t indicated his intentions toward joining the lawsuit, but just in case, feel free to contact his office at (919) 716-6400, and let him know how you feel about it.
This article appears in Mar 30 – Apr 5, 2010.
Boy oh boys oh boy, look like I forgot to take my med AGAINED!
So let me aporogize for all the dumbass comment I continues to made. I sory for acting like a moron and being such a all-arround douchebag.
If it make you feels any better, I know I a asshole when I not on my medicinations. Hell I a asshole even when I AM on my medicatations! (he he)
But I am especially stupid when I skip my meds because in adition to being an asshole, I also a whiny, uninformed, right-wing redneck who get hysterrical over nothing!
And I can’t spel for shit!
Anyways, see you at the Tea Klux Klan Partys! Yaaaaayyyyy!!!!!
Griffin, do you buy car insurance? And it’s because it’s legally required, right? So where does that leave your argument about the big bad govt. forcing someone to buy health insurance?
As for your other comments for this post, it’s obvious you don’t have the slightest idea what you’re talking about — your goofball reasoning on “the general welfare” excuse is so ignorant on so many levels, it’s mind-boggling. And you don’t have even a basic grasp of what the commerce clause disagreement is about – it’s conservatives who are trying to “slap the commerce clause” on healthcare reform, not liberals “slapping” it on . . . whoever it is you’re thinking they’re slapping (who can tell with arguments as full of B.S. as yours?). Put down the bottle the next time you decide to enlighten the world with your super-intelligent, reasoned arguments.
Frank, re this:
“The big problem is that without the government forced everyone to have health insurance in the first place there would be no commerce dor the federal government to stick their nose into.”
Sorry, but…..what the fuck does that mean? I’m not even sure it’s English. Have you skipped your meds again? Even your written words are disjointed, non-sensical and slurry. I can’t imagine what it’s like to hear you speak.
And I see you bring nothing to the table but stale leftovers from the tired-ass Beck/Rush loony bin, so I assume you are Frank Griffin.
Being forced to buy something is the same in all areas.
I don’t buy the GOP argument that being forced buy auto insurance is not the same thing as Obamacare.
We are forced to buy auto insurance if we want to travel in our own vehicles. No wonder there’s such a huge personal injury industry for attorneys.
We’re forced to get a license from the State to even drive!
We are forced to fund Medicare, Medicaid & Social Security through our taxes — which are taken by force.
I thought we lived in a free country??
These GOP AG’s are playing games again. How come no one is trying to bring their state’s national guards home from Iraq and Afghanistan? OR letting folks opt out of Medicare?
Where’s the real State’s Rights folks?