Poor, pitiful Rep. John Fleming, the multi-millionaire who can't afford a tax hike

President Obama seems to have finally gotten a couple of messages: 1) John Boehner and congressional Republicans aren’t interested in cooperating with him, and 2) the president’s progressive base of voters is infuriated by his repeated caving to said Boehner & Co. The result of the Prez’s sudden clarity is a $447 billion jobs plan and a strategy to cut long-term debt, largely by raising taxes on the mega-wealthy who’ve enjoyed a cushy ride for three decades.

The Obama plan is a far cry from the GOP’s draconian — hell, dystopian — vision. Boehner & Co. want to make deep cuts in Medicaid spending, raise no taxes at all, and turn Medicare into a quasi-private insurance plan that would put the burden of reducing the deficit on the backs of the elderly who have paid into Social Security their whole working lives. The White House would, instead, bring Medicare savings by allowing the system to negotiate lower drug and physician costs for recipients of benefits, and would bring in at least $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue over the next decade, specifically from the richest two percent of Americans — in other words, from those who essentially own the country and have made a killing during the nation’s dire financial crisis.

Needless to say, Republicans are exhibiting their usual rhetorical tic, calling Obama’s plan . . . . wait for it . . . “class warfare.” Who’d-a guessed? Rep. John Fleming (R-La.), for instance, was on MSNBC yesterday, charging that Obama’s plan will kill job creation (what job creation?) and claiming that although he earned $6.3 million last year, he couldn’t afford Obama’s tax hike, which, for him, would amount to around $4,500.

The charge of class warfare is sadly hilarious, considering that during the past three decades — that is, since the beginning of the pro-big-business Reagan era — national wealth has been increasingly concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people. Today, the top 1 percent of Americans own more than 50 percent of all assets in the U.S.; they also own more than 70 percent of all financial assets. In the meantime, of course, 7 million manufacturing jobs — a third of the jobs in the whole economy — were moved overseas; record numbers of Americans are struggling to survive financially; and many of the biggest corporations are raking in record-setting profits, while their CEOs enjoy record-shattering bonuses. Faced with these kinds of facts, it’s hard to disagree with Texas writer Jim Hightower who says class warfare has been in effect in America for some time, as a small minority of money gluttons redistributed the national wealth upward and into their own pockets.

Obama’s plan isn’t perfect, but it’s better than anything he’s come up with so far, and it’s certainly preferable to the ongoing real class warfare being waged by the mega-rich on the rest of us. It’s a plan he should have been pushing for months, if not years. We’ll see how the Prez fares when it’s time to cobble together final legislation, but at least for the time being, Obama isn’t giving away the farm to the GOP, and he’s looking like more of a fighter than we’ve seen since the 2008 election.
For a bonus explanation of U.S. economic policy over the past 30 years, here’s an excerpt of a report from CommonDreams.org, a liberal think tank:

Dramatically lower taxes on the wealthiest people in the country; meanwhile, undercut the working and middle classes by shipping their jobs overseas so corporations can profit by paying Chinese and Indian workers 5% of what they pay American workers; send the finished products back to the U.S. and sell them to former workers with now-downsized jobs by getting them to take on onerous levels of debt; when that is still not enough to keep the economy afloat, have the government increase its debt, in the process binding those former and downsized workers with government debts that they will carry for the rest of their lives; have the whole system laundered through big banks who create nothing, but take a piece of the action on every transaction; make sure these banks are “too big to fail” so that when they fail, the downsized, indebted workers can be made to disgorge the last of their remaining assets in order that the banks and their owners don’t suffer any losses on their predatory investments that went bad.

Repeat this process until the working and middle classes have been milked of all of their assets and their wealth has been transferred into the hands of the richest people on earth.

Poor, pitiful Rep. John Fleming, the multi-millionaire who cant afford a tax hike

  • Poor, pitiful Rep. John Fleming, the multi-millionaire who can’t afford a tax hike

John Grooms is a multiple award-winning writer and editor, teacher, public speaker, event organizer, cultural critic, music history buff and incurable smartass. He writes the Boomer With Attitude column,...

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

  1. Well, somebody tell me how much of the rich guy’s money should the government take? 25%, 35%, 50%, 70%? Does he have any say so in what is done with the money? Now what, you expect him to go out and hire some new folks, and pay their medical insurance, too? The liberal agenda can only survive in a huge bureaucratic mess where half the people are already receiving government assistance. It would not last a month in a small village. We need somebody in power who actually understands business and job creation to create a business friendly environment. We need tax reform. We need more taxpayers, not higher taxes that stifle growth. Every unbiased economist will tell you that raising taxes right now would be disasterous. Obama knows it has zero chance to pass. He just proposed it as part of his re-election strategy. Yeah, just raise the capital gains taxes to 35% or 40% and see what happens to the markets. By the way, most investment capital was already taxed once when it was earned. While I’m at it, we also need to get out of military conflicts all over the world. We cannot democratize the globe.

  2. Are you freaking kidding me? I am so tired of the conversative BS. The wealthy and corporations have raped this country for the last 2 decades. If I hear conversatives say tax cuts creates jobs one more time…I am going to scream. Because it is BS. We continue to offshore as much work as possible, give inflated bonuses to CEO and executive, and pass the rest to Shareholders and claim the grow is from good business practices. And the percentage of tax hike is not outrages. No ONE is asking for “Class Welfare”…for 50%+ from the weathy. Just Pay your share!! And not use every loop hole to get out of paying taxes. I will agree with you on tax reform. Definiely needed. And from an Economist point of view, there are going to tell you to offshore work. It is cheaper and will bring better SVA. Free Market…which I believe in to a certain point. But it would again have us go for the cheap labor, no benefits for employees, etc. Hell, it would have let all the big bank fall. How would the market have been then?

    How about linking tax breaks to employee growth for a corporation? Keeping job onshore and dollars domestic which will increase consumer spending and hopefully savings. How about redesigning and streamline social programs to provide assistance that lead to helping people to become productive citizens? Then there is cut Medicare? Seriously? Tell that to all the Baby Booms that paid into the system…that fought in the major wars of our time…and helped make this country great…”Sorry, we are going to screw you in your old age”

    All the liberties you enjoy to become a successful, weathy, educated and FREE person….comes with social responsiblities as well. And somehow, paying taxes to help all citizen and protect our way of life is not worth it?!?

    We ask soliders to go fight for our freedoms everyday, but God forbid is we are asked to open our wallet to share the burden of providing for our country.

    Finally, getting out of some of these conflicts are a must. Iraq should have never happened. PERIOD! Afghanistan should have been the target for Osama…But now, we should pull out of there too. So, I agree with you on that.

  3. >> Just Pay your share!!

    And what of the 47% of households who pay NO federal income tax?

    What is THEIR “share”?

  4. “Every unbiased economist will tell you that raising taxes right now would be disasterous (sic).” Bullshit, Willie — unless by “unbiased” you actually mean “agrees with Willie.” “Raising taxes” on people in the top 2% is simply going back to the rates they had during the Clinton administration – which sure as hell didn’t seem to suppress growth. How about if you and DickWad and others like you get your heads out of your butts — or at least away from the FauxNews fantasy factory — and realize you’ve bought into a serious line of bullshit that leads you to side with the economic vultures that run your fucking lives.

  5. Ok look you want more tax revenue….? Flat tax.. get rid of the IRS… It’s a stupid organization and the tax code is over 1000 pages.. now all that said… You regulate banks and we get an ATM fee. You tax a giant corp…. And we pay more… You tax the “rich” they spend, invest,and employ less. Figure out the secondary effects before you spout off about the benefits of a plan. Every one needs to contribute. And NO I am not one of the “super wealthy” I net 26K per year.. I just understand that when you take someone’s profits away… They WILL find a way to recoup those profits. For crying out loud figure that one out… It’s not rocket science.. its pretty simple. If I reduce your pay you spend less and cut your budget… Guess what… “Rich” people and “giant corps.” Think the exact same way.. duh!!!!!!

  6. Someone once said that the reason many Americans defend (or, let’s face it, worship) the rich is that they’ve bought into the illusion that they might be allowed to be rich too one day. Saps. Dug, at $26K, stands proudly for the vultures who used our economy as their personal casino, to the longterm detriment of all of us. Exactly the brainwashed attitude I was talking about in the previous comment.

  7. Wow. Lots of hatred and misinformation posted here. Welcome to the liberal, socialist, democrat camp. I will give the example of my grandparents as people who retired as millionaires. How did they do it? They scrimped, they saved and they (wait for it) worked their ASSES off. The government never had to lend them a helping hand because they helped themselves. So after amassing that money, and using it to take care of themselves the rest of their lives, they began to have to protect their money from new taxes and the goverenment’s new ways of trying to take their money. Now, it may seem like a pipe dream to believe you can retire a millionaire, but I have seen it with my own eyes. (Look at old Reader’s Digest magazines that show how “common”, working folks can do the same.) The sad reality is, that all of the money they made and saved has been taxed to death. Taxed when they made it the first time, taxed when they gained interest (in the good years) on it while invested, and taxed when they died and the next generation inherited it. Now, I am all for paying my “fair share”, but how much should the government take from people who survived the Great Depression, went to school in a one-room schoolhouse, did their civic and moral duty, took care of their family, and just happened to become financially successful? What most people keep missing is that money all these rich people make was actually MADE at some point, TAXED at some point, and continues to be TAXED. It is indeed properly called class warfare when the “Haves” are pitted against the “Have Nots”. But just remember, many of those “Haves” came from humble beginnings and should not be penalized for being successful. My grandparents were more than happy to tell anyone who would listen how they made their money and how they invested it and how they grew their nest egg. Unfortunately, most Americans do not abide by their first tenent: Live below your means. And save 10% of every dime you make!

  8. …and when your grandparents were making their money the companies they dealt with were not giant multinational entities composed of multilevel independent subsidiaries in which they could hide profits like a shell game. The CEO didn’t make $14 million a year and most manufacturing was not done in the third world. Before WW-II, the USA actually used to only fight wars when we were attacked, now we have a pretty much constant state of war. The perpetual war machine has become a major part of our economy.

    A lot of other people’s grandparents lost good paying jobs they had been doing for 40 years when a rich person bought the company in a hostile leveraged buyout and stripped it of it’s assets, including the workers.

    It is not possible for EVERYONE to become rich in a Capitalist society. Contrary to Conservative beliefs, wealth does not “trickle down”, it flows up. Rich people do not create wealth, they get their wealth from YOU. Business owners do not use their wealth to create jobs, they use your job to create wealth.

    Isn’t it odd that Fox News junkies easily buy the logic that if you prohibit businesses from victimizing you in one area they will just do it in another area because profit is everything but also believe that if you make them pay taxes then they will cut jobs because avoiding taxes is more important than increasing profit?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *