OK, which one of you clowns wants to put me in my place?

We all know that most Republican members of Congress would rather be living in the 1950s, those golden, fantasy days, when Leave It To Beaver-ish blandness set the national tone and the whole reason for America’s existence was to kowtow to white males. Yes, we already knew that’s how they feel, but yesterday, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) put on full display the backward-looking, resentful cretinism that’s taken hold of their party.

The NRCC issued a press release criticizing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for saying it would be difficult to get Democratic House members to vote for additional troops in Afghanistan. OK, fair enough. They don’t like her position. That’s par for the course in politics. But the NRCC took it two steps farther. First, they implied that since conservatives’ new favorite guy, Gen. McChrystal, says we need 40,000 more troops, civilian leaders should jump to attention and hand over whatever he wants pronto, forgetting that civilians set military policy in the U.S. Just as troubling, though, is the NRCC’s  statement that “taxpayers can only hope that Gen. McChrystal is able to put her (Pelosi) in her place.” Put her in her place. And what place would that be, NRCC? In what place should the first female Speaker of the House be put? Back in the kitchen, or scrubbing the floors, or, at the very least, being submissive to a jug-eared guy in a uniform? Sexist condescension fairly drips from the NRCC’s statement about Pelosi, and they need to be called on it in the halls of Congress.

Deliver Us From Weasels, a collection of 50 of John Grooms’ best columns and articles, will be published in November by Main Street Rag Press. The book will cost $14.95, but can be purchased in advance through Oct. 26 for $10 including shipping at www.mainstreetrag.com/store/ComingSoon.php

OK, which one of you clowns wants to put me in my place?

John Grooms is a multiple award-winning writer and editor, teacher, public speaker, event organizer, cultural critic, music history buff and incurable smartass. He writes the Boomer With Attitude column,...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. As a woman I can honestly say I would rather be living in the 1950s as well. At least marriage and family in those days actually meant something as opposed to the “anything goes” values of the day. Women in this day, much more so than in earlier times are nothing more than sex toys in a casual sex culture. Half of all marriages ending in divorce. Single motherhood,etc. If that is “liberation” you can have it. I feel less respected in the modern day not more.

    As for the Pelosi comments, this sounds to me like a mere figure of speech. Do you honestly doubt they would like to see a male liberal ”put in his place” by a female conservative? You people need to quite seeing “isms” being every tree. I am a woman. If I were also in a position like this I would be embarrased by you people rushing in to paint my as an ”oppressed” victim.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *