Credit: Mert Jones

On Sunday night, about 40 workers came together in the production kitchen of Amelie’s French Bakery to hear owner Lynn St. Laurent apologize to them.

“How do you tell people who work so hard that you’re sorry for humiliating them?” St. Laurent told me on Monday.

She humiliated them in a poorly worded statement, released Saturday on Amelie’s Facebook page, describing those workers as “not otherwise employable,” risky and prone to initiating conflicts when they become disgruntled. The well-known warm, friendly tone of Amelie’s was replaced by a bitter, elitist voice that spoke of its own work family with a sense of superiority and vitriol.

The statement was a response to allegations – made by a former employee in an open letter – of serious worker’s rights abuses.

“We abandoned our voice and posted what we’d been advised,” by a business associate, St. Laurent says, though she wouldn’t specify who. “None of us caught the word ‘unemployable’ because we knew who wrote the statement and we knew his heart and what his intentions were.”

Amelie’s made itself a PR mess to clean up, but that may not be the worst of its problems. The U.S. Department of Labor has confirmed that it received a complaint from a former worker about wage improprieties and is “reviewing the situation.”

Though the department would not specifically name the employee, it is likely Justin Miller, a former manager of Amelie’s production kitchen and author of the public resignation letter. He alleges that employees are not being paid overtime, are being asked to log into their pay system under two different accounts so that total hours worked is not accurately reflected, are being asked to work off the clock and are working 24-hour shifts without breaks.

St. Laurent says Amelie’s pays overtime in every situation in which law requires it, but it uses a strategy called “cross-utilization” to train employees in different areas so they can advance through the organization and earn extra hours. These hours are counted separately from their normal work schedule. St. Laurent says “it would be illegal if we required these extra hours. We use [cross-utilization] only in situations where employees request it and use it for advancement.”

She added, “There’s very strict guidelines in place and we have people who understand them and monitor and review these processes.”

A contact at the N.C. Department of Labor, however, said this practice is illegal. No matter what position or how many positions you hold for a company, it must pay overtime for 40-plus hours worked.

Miller says that he didn’t take going public with these allegations lightly. “To be honest, this is really scary. I went into this knowing I might be throwing my career away. This isn’t something I’d make up, given these stakes.”

Before his year and a half long stint at Amelie’s, Miller spent four years in Indiana protesting utility rates with the Citizen’s Action Coalition.

His passion for activism is something St. Laurent both admires and sees as a possible cause for him coming forward with what she says are exaggerated claims.

“I have a high regard for people who are activists and work to protect employees. Justin and I are on the same side in that respect,” she says. “Maybe this was a good opportunity to bring awareness to his passion. I don’t see him as someone who’s vindictive, but I see him as someone who … if it might help the cause, might take facts and misconstrue them.”

Though Miller admits he hopes to become a labor organizer in the future, he says the situation at Amelie’s spawned his aspirations, not the other way around. He insists his primary concern is for the workers.

Most of the employees who worked under him in the production kitchen had come to Amelie’s through a job-placement program for people with criminal records. He says that while it may seem admirable that Amelie’s hires people in tough situations, these are the workers most likely to be exploited.

“When they’re asked to work off the clock, they fear if they say no, they’ll lose their job,” Miller says. “And some of them will go back to prison if they lose their job.”

Although as an employee he noticed problems coming from management, he kept quiet. The last straw for him was when he and St. Laurent met on Feb. 26 and St. Laurent told him he’d have to end the staff-meal program he had started with his manager’s approval.

“I wanted to make sure my staff was getting at least one good meal a day,” Miller says. “I felt it was my responsibility if they were working under me.”

“His passion for his employees caused him to make decisions that wouldn’t have allowed us to stay in business,” St. Laurent says, adding that when Miller was a manager, most of Amelie’s revenue was going to labor, not enough to food and packaging costs. “That doesn’t leave a whole lot to pay the rent and keep the lights on.”

But Miller says that even something as basic as having worker’s rights information posted somewhere visible, as required by law, is something he had to fight for. He says he brought the fact that the posters weren’t present to the attention of two managers, who said they’d “run it up the chain of command” before emails show he contacted the N.C. Department of Labor to complain in May 2013. No action was taken by the department or management, and Miller said the posters were still not up at the time of his resignation, almost one year later.

St. Laurent says she was never made aware of this complaint and calls the situation “ridiculous,” saying, “it’s just putting up a poster.” She admits to being unsure whether the posters are up now. “I would’ve done it myself if I had known.”

The bakery has been hugely successful since opening in NoDa, not just because of its delicious salted caramel brownies and macarons, but because of its image as a progressive establishment doing good work in the community. St. Laurent was even invited to the White House, where she talked about hiring those just leaving jail or rehab. “Our policies in the work place are built around understanding the amazing difference it can make when people with challenges are given a place where they are accepted … and encouraged to grow,” she said during her speech.

Amelie’s success translated into a second location in Uptown, a third in Rock Hill, and an expansion into the Atlanta market in the works. Amelie’s has much to lose if the U.S. Department of Labor’s investigation finds Miller’s allegations to be true.

St. Laurent says she’s confident her record speaks for itself and that Amelie’s will be launching its own internal investigation. It’s hired an independent organization to review management processes to ensure they are “consistent with our beliefs and the things we’re passionate about.”

Miller has asked that people concerned about his allegations not boycott the business, but rather, speak up and ask them to do the right thing. “I think it would be a good gesture for customers to come in and show support for the workers.” He says offering them words of encouragement and demanding management treat them fairly can greatly effect change. He is currently working on a petition for the latter.

St. Laurent stressed her commitment to all her workers remaining employed, saying every worker has a place at Amelie’s “as long as you’re not mean and you own up to things when they go wrong.”

Ana McKenzie contributed to this report.

Related Stories

Join the Conversation

26 Comments

  1. They knew it was illegal to not pay that overtime. You would think she would have learned by now to stop talking.

  2. Now they need to look into Sugarland here in Raleigh. Same stuff happening under much worse conditions. Too bad they ignore every email I send.

  3. “Before his year and a half long stint at Amelie’s, Miller spent four years in Indiana protesting utility rates with the Citizen’s Action Coalition.”

    So this is not the first time this guy is going around throwing stones. I hope Amelies files a lawsuit for defamation if the investigation fails to show wrongdoing.

    Ultimately we should expect someone to pay, either Amelies or Mr.Miller.

  4. I read what was reported of Lynn St. Laurent’s comments, and all I can say is ranchers sell it by the ton. For instance those posters are required by law, so”it’s just putting up a poster” is no excuse. I knew that when I was 18, how old is Ms St. Laurent? If you are unable to pay your workers the pay they deserve for the hours they work without going under, then it should be obvious you are in the wrong business.

  5. “Before his year and a half long stint at Amelie’s, Miller spent four years in Indiana protesting utility rates with the Citizen’s Action Coalition.”

    So this is not the first time this guy is going around throwing stones. I hope Amelies files a lawsuit for defamation if the investigation fails to show wrongdoing.”

    So you are saying it is wrong for a citizen of these United States to be willing to come forward and stand up for our rights? That wanting to be part of the solution to the systematic exploitation of the public by businesses by bring those abuses out into the light of day where everybody can see them is somehow the wrong thing to do. hummm, I think Amelies is hiring, should be right up your alley.

  6. “So you are saying it is wrong for a citizen of these United States to be willing to come forward and stand up for our rights? That wanting to be part of the solution to the systematic exploitation of the public by businesses by bring those abuses out into the light of day where everybody can see them is somehow the wrong thing to do. hummm, I think Amelies is hiring, should be right up your alley”

    My point is, You should be responsible for what you do and what you say, period.

    If you are willing to berate somebody publicly, you better have the facts. Some of the accusations are serious and should not be taken lightly. I am going to give you an example in order to help see the other side. Lets say you open a business and an ex employee makes false accusations because he is concerned for labor/health/equal opportunity/immoral/etc issues and make you so unpopular that you end up closing shop even if you prove him/her wrong.

    Now, you tell me, was that fair to you?

    Now, back to my original point. If, ONLY IF Amelies is found to be compliant with the law then what would you say?
    I would expect AT LEAST an apology letter from Mr.Miller.

  7. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is clear. Workers paid an hourly wage and must report all work hours are non – exempt, and must be paid time and half for all hours actually worked in excuse of 40 hours. Merely using different account codes to justify labor performed for different projects doesn’t justify not paying overtime to these workers. In addition, her flipped comment about “just posters” further show her disregard for required notifications under law. If the DOL assess that Amelia’s has worked these employees in excess of 40 hours, this is a violation under FLSA with financial and reputation ramifications.

  8. its all over.this has became the American way.until this generation realize this is wrong.but this generation only cares about self.yet, u can always change.business does not care about u,family,ma,dad or kids.just the DOLLAR

  9. ” These hours are counted separately from their normal work schedule. St. Laurent says “it would be illegal if we required these extra hours. We use [cross-utilization] only in situations where employees request it and use it for advancement.”

    That sounds like a guilty plea to me.

    That said, I admire an employer who is willing to help people get a fresh start after making bad choices. I bet she gets some very motivated workers from that pool. When we refuse to hire a person who has a criminal record, we guarantee that person will remain a criminal. After all, they have to eat.

  10. Karen and BJ Fuller- Thanks for your comments. In regards to Lynn St. Laurent’s comment about the posters, I feel I should clarify. She wasn’t disregarding them as unimportant, she was saying that it’s ridiculous the complaint wasn’t handled immediately, because the simple task of hanging a poster is all that was required. She says the problem was never brought to her attention and if it had been, it’s something she could’ve/would’ve handled personally.

  11. But she still doesn’t know if the posters are up? Did she know of this problem before you asked her about it in your interview, or was that the first she was hearing of it?

  12. Jay – The complaint was included in Justin Miller’s resignation letter. She read the letter prior to the interview, so I assume she’d already learned about the posters.
    However, when I told her Mr. Miller said he’d brought it to the attention of two managers and provided an email he’d sent the NC Dept. of Labor about it in May 2013, she was very surprised to learn that.

  13. St. Laurent’s comment below is hard to swallow when they have opened up in Uptown, Rock Hill and now entering Atlanta. Yep, doesn’t smell like French pastries smells more like BS.

    “His passion for his employees caused him to make decisions that wouldn’t have allowed us to stay in business,” St. Laurent says, adding that when Miller was a manager, most of Amelie’s revenue was going to labor, not enough to food and packaging costs. “That doesn’t leave a whole lot to pay the rent and keep the lights on.”

  14. Anyone who disobeys or simply turns a blind eye to state or federal labor laws should be investigated. If said businesses are guilty, which Amelies is, then the employees should be compensated. I feel the response this company gave to the allegations is repulsive. Any smart business owner would proof read such a serious statement before posting it, and I believe the “unemployable” comment was approved by management before it went public. This entire scenario may be a PR nightmare to the business, but their representation as a helpful community company is a joke in itself. I’ll buy my pastries at Nova’s, or better yet Publix. Screw this lady.

  15. If business owners would make the investment of starting pay for their employees at $15 an hour (which is still $6 below what economists believe is a proper ‘living wage’) we wouldnt feel the need to be “activists”. People would feel like they actually need to earn that amount of money an hour.
    In America, a business owner paying anyone less than half of a ‘living wage’ is doing society injustice; because when an employee realizes their underemployed, they become jaded and un-inspired to work at a level above their pay.
    A proper business owner would be sure to treat their employees as the human beings that they are; rather than as a replaceable object that is costing them money.

  16. This is not exclusive to Amelies but we are all subsidizing businesses that do not pay a living wage. We pay when their employes get all their health care from the ER. We pay when they need section 8 housing to continue to live in CLT. We pay when they require EBT benefits to feed their families. Companies that cannot find a way to pay their employees as part of their business model should go out of business and not be mourned.

  17. I was let go from Earth Fare supermarket, in 2006, because I was standing up for the employees and informing them of their rights. Earth Fare found a bogus reason to fire me and then held meetings with employees to coerce them into not forming a union. They even went so far as to requiring that employees attend a meeting where they showed a video explaining why unionizing is bad for them.

    On the positive side, letting me go was the best thing for me, since it lead to my becoming a community organizer and helping people fight back against injustice.

  18. Hector:

    Be honest in your post. You were fired because you were trying to unionize the other employees. Why did you use the union code words ” because I was standing up for the employees and informing them of their rights”?

    I am not making a judgment over whether or not the union was needed, just the way you minimized your description of your actions.

  19. Justin Miller’s idea is an interesting one…i think each of us should walk into various business establishments and ask to speak to the owner. then we should tell the owner that they should pay their staff what WE think they ought to be payed, as opposed to what the owner believes is reasonable. this is AMERICA!

    we should also demand that the prices at the businesses we protesting against ramain THE SAME for us, the consumers, as they implement the wages we demand they pay.

    essentially, we should demand that business owners make do with less and give away more of their profits, because it’s the right thing to do.

    it also just makes sense for the owner’s of Amalie’s to do as we demand, because if they don’t raise their wages, headhunters in the catering industry are looming with benefits-laden contracts and signing bonuses to lure their employees away!!!

  20. @gracie – Thanks for your comment & I see what you did there with the sarcasm. However, I think a main idea Justin Miller had was that this employer – and all others- should follow labor laws. I wouldn’t call it “interesting’, it’s actually pretty standard. Many businesses today do just that & are thriving. In AMERICA!

  21. hi Erin,

    it’s not so much the idea that businesses should properly adhere to USDL parameters regarding overtime pay. it’s a broader thing than that, really.

    Miller’s idea to walk into a business and demand an owner pay their current employees more for alleged misdeeds in the past is nonsensical. if the allegations are proven true, then there will be a day in court (and more likely than not, a settlement), and that should be that.

    raising the pay of current employees is an entirely different issue. it’s a thorny topic, because the overall economic benefits of raising the minimum wage are pretty evident, but i’m also sympathetic to paying people what the market will bear.

    although CL is a fun read and a great thing to have on your resume, if the NYT or Salon called tomorrow and offered you a nice raise along with prominent desk, i assume you’d be gone in a heartbeat.

    the question, to me, is what are the staff at Amalie’s worth…and who decides that worth? not the owner?

    – Gracie

  22. just another scumbag ‘job creator’ – raise the minimum wageto $15 hour tomorrow!

  23. Gracie:

    Where, in any of this, did you see anyone saying prices could not be set based on cost to produce the product? Your whole claim of reduced profits is based on the red herring of price control, which was never mentioned.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *