THE SORCERER

By Matt Brunson

THE SORCERER’S APPRENTICE
**
DIRECTED BY
Jon Turteltaub
STARS Nicolas Cage, Jay Baruchel

THE SORCERER

It isn’t a Jerry Bruckheimer production if the movie doesn’t hit the ground running, and sure enough, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice gets off to a frantic start with a whirlwind sequence in which reams of centuries-old back story and endless exposition are dumped on the audience’s collective head in order to quickly let the modern-day bulk of the movie commence. But as is often the case with the punishing producer, the prologue is so loud and frenzied and chaotic that I was ready to leave upon its conclusion, feeling as if I had already sat through an entire movie’s worth of bruising behavior.

This penchant for creating faux-excitement simply by making everything blaring and calamitous is a specialty not only of Bruckheimer but also director Jon Turteltaub, who previously gave us two daft National Treasure movies (if you somehow haven’t seen that pair, they’re like 6th-grade versions of Raiders of the Lost Ark). This is basically more of the same, although unlike that twofer, this at least has the decency to clock in at under two hours.

Nicolas Cage is miscast as Balthazar Blake, one of Merlin’s original disciples(!) who turns up in modern-day New York City after countless centuries searching for the Prime Merlinian (not to be confused with the Prime Meridian or even Optimus Prime), a novice wizard expected to eventually be about as powerful as Merlin was back in the millennium. Balthazar discovers that a geeky college kid named Dave Stutler (Jay Baruchel, last heard training a dragon) is the object of his search, and he hopes that after providing the proper tutelage, Dave will be able to help him fight off another Merlin disciple: Maxim Horvarth (Alfred Molina), the Judas to Balthazar’s John.

THE SORCERER

Inspired in part by the delightful Mickey Mouse sequence from Disney’s 1940 Fantasia (there’s even a scene in which Dave battles dancing mops), The Sorcerer’s Apprentice is strictly standard action-fantasy fare, not too bad as these Bruckheimer boom boxes go. There’s some clever CGI trickery mixed in with the more lackluster effects, Baruchel is appealing in his limited way, and the jackhammer pace ensures that there’s no time to get bored. But is any of it memorable? Hardly. I remember the contours of my theater seat better than I recall the particulars of this cinematic sleight of hand.

Matt Brunson is Film Editor, Arts & Entertainment Editor and Senior Editor for Creative Loafing Charlotte. He's been with the alternative newsweekly since 1988, initially as a freelance film critic before...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. I hate it when critics give a negative review to a movie because they think they’re cinematic palette is just too refined for such a trifle. Did you seriously go to a Bruckheimer movie and expect to see something that would leave such a lasting impression that it would alter your life? Come on, it’s a popcorn flick, filled with spectacle. Take it for what it’s worth. Just two hours of mind numbing entertainment.

  2. Uh Rich… it’s a movie about MAGIC. Did you really expect it to be “realistic”?

    I agree with Randal. This was a great Bruckheimer movie, fun and smart (science + magic = very cool). In my opinion, next to Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl, best live-action Disney movie ever. ๐Ÿ™‚ I’ve gone to see it three times, and seen new things in it each time, and can’t wait to get it on DVD. Coming from a stingy movie-goer like me, that’s high praise.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *