THE EQUALIZER 2
** (out of four)
DIRECTED BY Antoine Fuqua
STARS Denzel Washington, Melissa Leo

Denzel Washington in The Equalizer 2 (Photo: Sony)

Much has been made of the fact that Denzel Washington, whoโ€™s been appearing in movies since 1981, has never starred in a sequel. In an industry that gets high off the fumes of highly lucrative follow-ups, thatโ€™s an incredible โ€” and impressive โ€” fact, and while itโ€™s hard to see sequels to, say, Malcolm X or Flight, other Denzel vehicles are certainly more franchise-friendly (personally, I would have enjoyed seeing his detective from Spike Leeโ€™s Inside Man tackle more criminal capers, but a proposed sequel was ultimately cancelled).

The Equalizer 2, therefore, represents the first time that the actor returns to the screen essaying the same character โ€” in this case, itโ€™s Robert McCall, a former CIA operative who employs his particular set of skills to aid the helpless and hopeless among us. Believed to be dead by everyone save for his CIA pal Susan Plummer (Melissa Leo) and her husband Brian (Bill Pullman), McCall is thus able to slip beneath societyโ€™s radar in order to perform his good deeds.

Released in 2014, The Equalizer (itself based on the popular 1980s TV series starring Edward Woodward) was a satisfying action yarn in which McCall protected a battered teen prostitute (Chloรซ Grace Moretz) against a gang of murderous, misogynistic Russians (or, as they will now alternately be known until the end of time, Trumpโ€™s overlords and Trumpโ€™s BFFs). Watching McCall deal with all manner of evildoers (not just Trumpโ€™s buddies but also corrupt cops and petty crooks) over the course of the film was a cathartic experience, but the movie also worked because of its kinetic action scenes as well as a gradual reveal of the layers of Washingtonโ€™s character.

The Equalizer 2 offers no such pleasures. This is a particularly dreary movie, one which makes no attempt to freshen up or even disguise its rote storyline. The film gets off to a vigorous start, as McCall tackles some kidnappers in Turkey and then, while serving as a Lyft driver in Boston (in the previous picture, he worked at Home Mart), beats the living hell out of a hotel room full of Menโ€™s Rights Activists. But then the picture turns stupid and stuporific. As in many an unimaginative sequel, This Time Itโ€™s Personalโ„ข, meaning that (modest Spoiler alert, though it is in the trailer) Susan gets killed once she gets too close to the truth regarding a faked murder/suicide (that truth is so fleetingly and haphazardly explained that it scarcely matters; Susan might as well have been slain for trying to steal a neighborโ€™s cherished pie recipe).

Thereโ€™s a betrayal that identically mirrors the one from last weekโ€™s Skyscraper, meaning that itโ€™s equally easy to sniff out the villainy right from this particular characterโ€™s introduction. A subplot involving McCallโ€™s mentoring relationship with a young kid (Ashton Sanders) seems to have been imported from a lesser ABC Afterschool Special from the 1970s. And while The Equalizer was excessively brutal because the plot demanded it (after all, we can brook no interference from Trumpโ€™s Russian masters in this country!), The Equalizer 2 is excessively brutal because the filmmakers demanded it. It all culminates with a lengthy battle royale in which McCall faces down the baddies while a storm rages all around them. Itโ€™s laughably absurd, and just one more reason why The Equalizer 2 is less than the sum of its slickly oiled parts.

Matt Brunson is Film Editor, Arts & Entertainment Editor and Senior Editor for Creative Loafing Charlotte. He's been with the alternative newsweekly since 1988, initially as a freelance film critic before...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. You Know, some people can’t help themselves. I happen to largely agree with your review, but you have to mention President Trump 3 Times? This film has nothing to do with him. Stretching much? And oh, BTW, if you were going after a liberal, I would also be just as annoyed. Would you insert politics, into, Say, a restaurant review too? If a restaurant starts with letter “T”, would you give it a bad review because it reminds you of someone? This nonsense on both sides is getting out of hand. Review films. Leave politics out of it. Remember what NBA Star MJ Said, on why he stayed out of politics when he played: “Republicans buy sneakers too”. Whichever side you attack, probably represents about half your reading audience. Why annoy or alienate half your audience? I follow sports, movies, etc., to get AWAY from the constant political garbage.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *