We at Creative Loafing knew Stephen Colbert’s presidential campaign was doomed long before the South Carolina Democrat Party’s executive council voted to kick his peach-lovin’ hiney back to New York.
How? He denied us an interview, breaking this writer’s bleedin’ heart. (Even the lefty-ist among us can nurse a secret crush on a few rightwing blowhards.)
We’d hoped to talk with the bear-phobic bloviator a few weeks ago (if he’s afraid of Smokey, how could we have expected him to stand up to Ahmadinejad? With an eyebrow raise?). First we approached Comedy Central. Then we went to his personal publicist, but his PR people — an assistant, no less! — shunned our overtures: “Thank you for thinking of Stephen, but unfortunately he is unavailable.” Way to keep in touch with the voters!
Then South Carolina’s alleged favorite son was in Columbia on Oct. 29 to snatch a key to the city and pander. (Crush Georgia? South Carolina can’t even keep rest area vending machines stocked, Stephen.) And he didn’t even call to let me know he’d be there.
I was hurt. Then I grew angry.
“Unavailable,” my ass. Apparently Mr. Col-BEAR is too busy taking money from campaign sponsor Doritos to talk about his campaign to anyone other than fatuous college crowds. Well, college crowds and Tim Russert. But let’s not be picky here.
For readers who have been living under a rock (or, in its Charlotte equivalent, Ballantyne), Colbert had planned to run for president in South Carolina. “After nearly 15 minutes of soul-searching, I have heard the call,” the host of The Colbert Report said on his Comedy Central show Oct. 16. But the good-thinking Democrats of the Palmetto state won’t let him on the ballot, preferring instead to limit the field to serious candidates — like Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.
Before their decision, insiders for the bear lobby provided Creative Loafing enough fodder to cobble together a make-believe interview with the poker-faced anchorman. What we found saddened and shocked us. Young children may want to flip straight to the strip club ads.
Creative Loafing: When I first heard that you were running for president, I thought I was dreaming. You’re my hero.
Colbert: This is not a dream. I’m far realler than Sam Brownback.
Didn’t you say that to Tim Russert already?
It worked then, didn’t it?
Why would you choose to run in a state that named its part of Interstate 20 after Strom Thurmond?
Strom was a great American. When he stood against integration, he wasn’t standing against black people. He was saying, ‘Why do we need to mix the races? I don’t even see race. So there’s nothing to mix.’ In fact, as president I will rename every road in the U.S. interstate system after Thurmond. I may even make The New York Times change its name to the Strom Thurmond Weekly.
Um, the Times is a daily.
Not under my administration. The way I see it, the pinkos at the Times should only be able to hurt America once a week.
Wouldn’t that violate the First Amendment?
My first executive order would be to scrap the Bill of Rights. Well, except for the Second Amendment. Haven’t you bought my book, I Am America (And So Can You!)? It’s far better than the U.S. Constitution. It’s a lot easier to read. And it has pictures, too. The Constitution hasn’t made the bestseller lists, has it? The market has spoken.
You’re a big believer in the market.
Capitalism works. And if you don’t like it, go live with the bears. I hear they live in communes.
Why are you really running in South Carolina? Is it just shtick? Are you trying to ride on the coattails of Dennis Kucinich’s overwhelming popularity here?
Kucinich is an evil leprechaun. No, I’m gunning for a spot on Mike Huckabee’s ticket. If I can speak at Bob Jones University, voters might not care that I once kissed a girl before we were betrothed. I shouldn’t say this, but a lot of the candidates had premarital sex — or so I hear. But I’m not running a negative campaign.
I thought you’d said you would never be No. 2.
That was before the America-haters at Comedy Central said they wouldn’t let me out of my contract. As VP, I could record my show and still make time for ribbon-cutting ceremonies and the funerals of second-tier heads of state. I’m envisioning less of a Dick Cheney-style vice presidency and more of a Dan Quayle model. Without, of course, Quayle’s rapier wit.
One more thing … are the rumors true: Do you want to make Bill O’Reilly the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations?
No. I’m holding out for Ann Coulter. She has soft negotiating skills that would enhance our standing among Muslim countries. O’Reilly would be new executive editor of the Strom Thurmond Weekly.
Thanks for not giving CL your time so we could conduct this imaginary interview.
You’re welcome. By the way, please quit sending that fan mail. I understand why you would want to stalk someone as important as me, but the Secret Service might not take those letters so lightly.
This article appears in Nov 7-13, 2007.




Jeez, this ‘article’ is a total fucking mess from top to bottom. Karen Shugart, your pathetic skill set as a journalist lies somewhere between High school and CPCC. Don’t despair, the world still needs Cafe Baristas.
Lame article. Not funny. Makes Charlote seem dumber than it already is. Thanks. Pick up an alt-weekly in D.C., San Francisco, Richmond, or Portland to see how one should be done. C.L. sucks. I pick up 20 or so copies each time I pass a stack and throw ’em away. You’re welcome.
Why would Colbert give a shit rag like Creative Loafing an interview? Your writing is terrible, as is the writing of the other C.L. staff. I mean, it’s B-A-L-L-A-N-T-Y-N-E, not Ballentyne. Do you people even proofread your articles? The only thing that blows harder than Stephen Colbert is Creative Loafing.
Colbert/Colbert ’08. Write it in.
“Lame article. Not funny. Makes Charlote seem dumber than it already is.”
Nope misspelling your citys name makes YOU seem dumber. Spell check people – Pleaze!
🙂
People that use these things “:-)” are usually fat and have bad breath…and live in Charlote.
Creative Loafing gets turned down from an interview so they whine and cry about it to the point where they put that interviewee on the front page of their paper then they make a moch interview?
Who is running the show. Somebody should be fired. Wait, its Creative Loafing, the most unprofessional bunch one sided cry babies. CL is acting like theyve never been turned down for an interview before.
I hope CL doesnt do this to every person that denies them an interview.
Parlaying a snub by the Cobert camp into a weak attempt at parody/sarcasm (badly written and unfunny) cover story was ill-advised and unprofessional. Both Shugart and the editor who greenlighted this nonsense should go work at Bojangles or something. This is pitiful and embarrassing.
If you all have nothing better to do than to critique stephen colbert all day, you need to re-assess your life. Stephen Colbert is a fun-loving guy who is simply out to put a smile on our face! Leave him the hell alone! You got what you wanted! He can’t run. Let it go…. besides, Stephen Colbert is more qualified to run this country than have of the candidates who have been accepted!
“We Hate Stephen Colbert”??
“We”??? Is that the company line or does this idiot Karen Shugart have a pet gerbil??
He’s a character, he doesn’t really exist.
I mean, if you wanted to interview someone fake and meaningless, you could’ve just trotted down a few cubicles and asked Perry Tannenbaum a few questions.
Heh, The Loaf certainly is beefing up their collection of idiot “writers”. Helluva “paper” you got there fellas. The level of pure incomptence is entertaining though, at least. Maybe I’ll send the editors a huge bunch of bananas and a tire swing for Christmas
This is a piece of shit article; go fuck yourself.
Oh, and when you say “We hate stephen colbert”, you really mean “I”
One thing to say: YOU IDIOT!
You’re overreacting. It’s ONE FREAKING INTERVIEW! GET OVER IT!
All, I think Colbert actually did give them an interview and this is all part of his schtick. The problem is that the article is so poorly written that it’s hard to tell it’s a tongue in cheek move. I could be wrong, but it looks like Karen is trying to replicate Mr. Colbert’s comedic style on paper, and it’s not coming across clearly. I mean, if CL was so pissed about being snubbed, why would they make a mock interview that mentions his new book and give him free advertising?
I’m just trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. Now if she actually didn’t get the interview, then I agree with you all that this is the dumbest article CL has ever come up with and she needs to be banished to the Auto-Trader to write.
Hi Everybody. I have an idea. Let’s stop picking up CL and tell our friends to do the same. Boycott all of the advertisers. It would also be fun to call some of the advertisers and tell them that you overheard someone on the phone at CL talking sh*t about them. And you can always say that they hate gays and Mexicans. Just some ideas. Goodbye.
I have to say that I agree with most, if not all the comments submitted for this wretched wet pile of dog feces masquerading as an article, pretending to be an interview. It’s even worse than Dan Savage’s advice column about anal sodomy and analingus they put in the “Arts” section.
The Loaf and Shugart should personally apologize to each and every reader who wasted 5 minutes of their life reading it.
Either this is mimicry gone awry or it’s just the worst bloody article ever written.
I can’t decide.
It’s not only misspelling Charlotte that makes us look like a bunch of goobers.
Good Article Ms. Shugart. Ms. Coulter as a diplomat is a stroke of genius.
This is the worst article ever written! You could never be HALF the person he is!
YOU DON’T EVEN DESERVE A STAR
GROW UP
and what is this “we” you speak of?
We don’t hate Stephen Colbert… He is a great man!
IT WAS 1 INTERVIEW…. GET OVER IT AND STOP WHINING ABOUT IT! GOD!
One cannot simply quote personalities such as Stephen Colbert; for, most of their premise lies in that they are keeping a straight face whilst spewing sarcasm at the unintelligent (such as Karen Shugart). It’s the intelligent audience, both live and television, that truly gets not only the sarcasm, but the message that using it entails. By using sarcasm in this manner, Colbert is able to say outloud, in words, what the unintelligent are either already thinking, or to what they will immediately, and without any thought of their own, agree; whilst at the same time those of us intelligent enough to understand the message can laugh at both the sarcasm itself and the bit about anyone believing it as truth. So, no, one cannot simply quote, on print, Colbert; you will only succeed in skewing the message, and pat on the back those unintelligent people that missed the true message the first few times around.
I know this was supposed to be funny, but Karen Shitgart missed the mark entirely.. She couldn’t write a newsletter for a day care center.
It wasn’t funny at all, just more shockingly amateurish,liberal cliche drivel courtesy of Creative Loafing, that like another commenter mentioned, will at least still absorb dog piss. Outside of that? totally useless.
Why is this the cover story? It’s one page (actually less than one page because of the super-sized photo in the middle). I agree with the above comments – this missed the mark, was probably done on the fly to fill blank space, used as a cheap marketing tactic and was a poor attempt at humor.
Carolyn Butler you are the publisher of this weekly, what were you thinking???
I hope a bear shits on you.
Do you have nothing else better than to actually write this shit?
Nobody cares, I promise.
If you think anyone will take CL seriously, you’re terribly mistaken.
Who is the editor of this rag? Not a good story but the fact that it made the front cover speaks volumes for how bad CL editor must be.
I’ll come out and admit that I’m not the biggest Colbert fan. When 10:30 pm rolls around I’m quick to turn the channel and watch Weeds or something. I find Stephen Colbert to be a bit nauseating to tell you the truth.
I’ve been a fan of Creative Loafing for a while now and this is the first time that I can say that I read an article that I thought was pretty much crap. I could tell were the funny parts were supposed to be but just didn’t really quite make me laugh out loud. Hopefully the hatred for Stephen Colbert will soon fade and he just might have a fan who doesn’t need to get drunk or high to watch his show.
I just read your article. And I’m going to make-believe I really enjoyed. And then I’m going to make-believe what you wrote was insightful, pervocative, and down right entertaining. Then I’m going to make-believe I emailed your boss and told him what a great article you wrote and you deserve a big fat raise. Honey, why should I invest my time in reading something that never happened? I haven’t read Creative Loafing in some time because of content like this. It’s quite apropo really. I read your article while on the pot, which is exactly where this magazine belongs. Let me know if your editors ever have anything of substance worth reading. Until then, my dog needs something to mess on while he’s in his crate. Keep up the great work.
Reading these posts was so much more entertaining than the actual piece. All of it was so funny. The best line has to be picking up 20 copies and throwing them away. Your welcome. Man this lady must feel like shit. Karen, I hope you look better than you write…