Mobile
Recent Comments
Re: “Cee-Lo v. John Lennon: To "religion" or not to "religion"”
Don't mean to rabbit trail here, but feel I need to clarify what I meant about the meanings being essentially the same. In my opinion the core tenet of most religions are supposed to lead to the same place. It's the people that have misinterpreted the heart of it to the point that they are very different. That is where I am coming from that none/all true mean the same the same thing to me.
Re: “Cee-Lo v. John Lennon: To "religion" or not to "religion"”
Hmm? I sort of understand where you are coming from regarding traditional folk, or other music where the original writers are obscure or even unknown, but here is that pesky little thing called copyright. That's where it gets really hairy. I'm pretty sure he could get in to some big trouble if the copyright holders decide to push it. It's not parody, nor does it fall under the fair use .
With that being said, my personal opinion is that it is semantics. "No religion too"/ "all religion's true" pretty much equates the same meaning for me. I really don't think there was any malice behind what he did. Just updated the same thought by a few years. I don't know? Something to think about for sure! Thanks for the article!
