First things first: Congratulations to President Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize. That having been said, a lot of people are scratching their heads and wondering if the Nobel committee should have waited for more definitive accomplishments in the area of world peace before giving Obama the award. The committee, however, made it clear that the award is for Obamas role in changing the terms of international relations, emphasizing diplomacy and international cooperation rather than dropping bombs on all our foreign problems a la Bush & Co. In effect, the award is being given to the American public for electing a President who doesnt scare the hell out of them.
Its an understandable reaction from a European viewpoint, but, to this writer, a Nobel Peace Prize should go to someone whos achieved more concrete results. But, this certainly isnt the first time the Peace Prize selection has raised eyebrows such as the times peace-mongering hippies like Henry Kissinger, Menachem Begin and Yassir Arafat won.
Naturally, were already hearing the standard shrieks of outrage from the usual gang of howler monkeys on the right, but thats to be expected. I just hope Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele is proud to share his disdain for Obamas award with other notable Nobel critics today, such as the Taliban.
Showing 1-5 of 5