The County Commission brawl over CIAA tickets has been a big fat mess, a surrealistic spectacle, an embarrassment, and a strong reminder that when government officials get serious about disagreements, both sides can wind up looking really bad. To keep this as short as possible, heres a recap of what has happened, with my own comments in brackets.
Since 2006, the county has given the CIAA $200,000 per year to help the league pay for its tournament. The CIAA gives books of tourney tickets to the Charlotte Regional Visitors' Authority, which turns around and gives tickets to the County Managers office, who then distributes them to whichever commissioners request them, or, ostensibly, to others whove expressed interest.
This year, Commissioner Bill James called out the arrangement as a conflict of interest, saying that commissioners should not accept gifts from a group that receives money from the county. [James assertion is so obviously true, its amazing that anyone has argued the point with him.] Actually, James went farther than calling it a conflict of interest, using terms such as bribes and calling the CRVA a bagman for County Manager Harry Jones [Id stick with obvious conflict of interest, which is bad enough, but hey, Im not Bill James. It is interesting, though, that James waited until an election year to expose the conflict of interest.]. The commissions two other GOP members joined James, saying they would give their tickets to charities, which could sell them to help the poor. [Thats the surreal part Republicans using the term help the poor as a weapon against Democrats.]
Commission chair Jennifer Roberts, so far the only person in this story who has kept her head, said she planned to pay for her own tickets to the CIAA tourney, thank you very much. Harry Jones proceeded to distribute tickets to the rest of the Dems on the commission, but didnt give any to the three Republicans. In an e-mail to James, Jones said restrictions on the tournament tickets forbid reselling them, and as is his style, Jones piled on, writing, You have made it very clear that you do not want the tickets, so none are being offered to you." [Mr. Self-Importance strikes again.] James raised hell, saying, in effect, that Jones was being a jerk [no argument here], and was setting up the Dems for an electoral butt-kicking. Meanwhile, the CRVA offered six books of tickets it had purchased to James so they could be given to the charities. [Anyone who thinks this arrangement wasnt cleared by, or come from, Jones office is probably more naïve than its safe to be.] James turned the tickets down, saying it would be an ethics violation to accept them. [Although he had been OK with taking the tickets from Jones for the same purpose which shows up the original offer to help the charities as a cynical political ploy (probably an effective one, but cynical nonetheless.)]
End result: James is absolutely right that the commissioners acceptance of the tickets is a glaring conflict of interest; Jones continues to think he can do whatever he wants; Roberts is both ethical and savvy; and the rest of the commissions Dems are either clueless or dont care about ethical issues (or even ethical appearances). Round and round it goes, where it stops, nobody knows.
Showing 1-3 of 3