ANNIE
***
DIRECTED BY Will Gluck
STARS Jamie Foxx, Quvenzhané Wallis
Here’s the thing about Annie, the little orphan girl created for the comics by Harold Gray and later brought to stage, screen and television: She’s never been defined by her race but her class. A child of the Great Depression, she found herself enjoying the good life once she crossed paths with the filthy rich Daddy Warbucks. It’s her social standing that’s always driven the story, not the color of her skin, which is why it’s been downright depressing to find so many people outraged that a black moppet has been cast in the part in the new Annie.
Of course, the United States of Racism came to full fruition in 2014, so it’s hardly surprising that such vitriol has been directed at a family film starring a talented 11-year-old (Beasts of the Southern Wild Oscar nominee Quvenzhané Wallis) who — gasp! — doesn’t sport red hair. Hey, past Annies of the Caucasian persuasion didn’t sport blank zombie eyes like in the comic, but the bigoted crackers were strangely silent about that. At any rate, Annie is the sort of movie that opens itself up to criticism, and even during the screening, I became aware of how savagely reviewed it would be (though I’m disappointed by the few scribes who are criticizing what they perceive as the “hip-hop” sensibilities of the piece, as if they were holding their collective noses while typing the word). The film is frequently awkward, suffers from some pedestrian choreography and wears its heart perhaps a bit too openly on its sleeve. But it’s also charming, well-acted (with the occasional exception of poor Cameron Diaz, trapped in the difficult role of Miss Hannigan) and, most surprisingly, quite funny. As Will Stacks, the modern-day Warbucks (he’s a cell phone magnate running for NYC mayor), Jamie Foxx is a delight, and the script by director Will Gluck and Aline Brosh McKenna works overtime in presenting clever topical twists on the stage show’s clichés.
If nothing else, this Annie is infinitely better than John Huston’s 1982 turkey, a grotesque version starring Albert Finney and Carol Burnett. Of course, while it was critically hammered back in the day, many of those lambasting the new take are now describing that older adaptation as a national treasure. Because white people.
This article appears in Dec 17-23, 2014.





Lol, wow. Somehow knew this review would eventually be coming: If you don’t like the new Annie, you are a racist. “White people…”
Thanks for writing. Of course, I never wrote that EVERYONE who disliked this movie is a racist, but I guess that’s an understandable defensive position to take by misquoting me. But if you think racism hasn’t played a large part in the reactions of MANY people, then you’re willfully being clueless. Sample comments found on the Internet.
“I’m not racist or anything … But this new Annie movie is all mixed up!!! Annie is WHITE!!!!!!”
“Annie was a freckled face redhead, not a nappy head parasite infected n***** shitbag! N****** ruin everything!!”
“Why are black movie guys intent on making re-do’s of successful white movie guys stuff???? No new ideas? No black people plots? NO TALENT?????”
“They made a n****r Annie. Why.”
“Why does Hollyweird have to remake every movie with n****s…??”
And this: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/07/1283004/–Annie-is-Black-and-Racists-Go-F-cking-Crazy
And this: http://thedailybanter.com/2014/03/moronic-racists-appalling-reaction-to-black-actress-starring-in-annie-remake/#7WIhijAXaPZp1XOj.99
I rest my case.
You think it’s wrong for people to use the n word (it is) however you seem ok with using cracker as a derogatory term for white people, hypocrisy much?
tom smith: When someone uses the n word, they’re insulting ALL black people. When someone uses “cracker” to denote racists, they’re insulting ONLY prejudiced people. Hardly the same thing, and why someone such as yourself would stick up for racists is beyond me.
Whether or not Annie was black or white, this movie was a bad attempt at making money. The movie was poorly acted (Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz) and had awful writing. It was also very “awkward” at times. But in the end, It was just another rehashed movie that was entirely dependent on Annie being black. But hey, I guess im just another one of those “bigoted crackers”.
Your review of this movie is completely offensive. You don’t get to decide how you use “cracker” or “n*gger” or “f*ggot” or any other offensive words. I saw the movie and I really thought it was a tired remake or a tired trope and I didn’t really love the original…except for Carol Burnett. Do better. Maybe take an online course in film review. Best of luck.
Let me get this straight, Jeffrey V.: You weren’t offended at all by the racist online comments I cited — they didn’t even rate a passing mention by you — yet my review is offensive. Riiiight. Methinks thou dost protest too much.
So … why then did black critics all (and I mean ALL) pan this movie?
Um, I guess for the same reason most critics of all races are panning it: They didn’t think it was any good.
The disconnect between what I’m clearly stating and what’s being distorted has proven to be VERY interesting.