We love public radio here at CL and we understand and support the pledge drives that stations like WFAE in Charlotte do each year. In fact, we encourage any public radio listener to pledge and pledge liberally.
However, some of the promos that public radio airs during pledge week make us cringe.
To wit: This morning, a smart-sounding public radio voice asked WFAE listeners, "Would you rather hear this (cue in a few metal guitar riffs) or this (cue in yawn-inducing music followed by Garrison Keillor welcoming folks to Lake Wobegon)?" The subtext for anyone under 50 is, "Would you rather hear energy on your radio station or the latest ambient collection Music for Geriatric Units?
The truth is, public radio is hardly the boring, yawn-inducing format that it was only a few years ago. When you check out NPR's music site, you find exciting, eclectic and adventurous features like "No Sleep Till Mexico City," hosts Jasmine Garsd and Felix Contreras' road trip to two big music events going on right now: the South By Southwest Music Conference in Austin, Tex., and Vive Latino in Mexico City. You'll find everything from a "First Listen" to the latest disc by Raleigh's Lost in the Trees to an exciting jazz-hip-hop fusion "Song of the Day" by one of the more adventurous current West Coast rappers, Kendrick Lamar.
And all of that doesn't even include the mix of smartly reported news, analysis, cultural reports and other stuff that public radio offers. So... what's up with trying to tune out and turn off listeners who'd like to hear a little energy on the radio? Those promos may have been right for an earlier era of public radio, but they're misguided for a public radio that's taken great strides in staying current and offering challenging, mind-opening new features over the past few years.
Psst, NPR: If you want to continue changing perceptions of public radio, change your promo staff.
Showing 1-3 of 3
NPR doesn't produce Prairie home -- that's American Public Media. So your confusion is really that you can't tell the difference between different companies -- sort of like blaming APPLE for a Microsoft commercial.
Second, the public radio audience really does skew older -- last report I saw was that the aver listener age is 65.
Ah, thanks for writing, Peter. I stand corrected and regret not doing thorough enough homework on this commentary before posting yesterday. So, I will amend my suggestion: American Public Media might want to take notes from NPR. That is, unless keeping the 65-year-old listeners at the expense of turning away younger listeners is what American Public Media — and by extension, any affiliate, such as WFAE, that airs those commercials — wants. After all, to an average listener (or donor) like me, NPR and APM is all the same when I'm listening to my community's generic public radio station.
I definitely love the NPR music site (and APP), but I'm guessing public radio marketing department knows which demo butters its bread. Which group is more likely to give in an age when an entire generation was raised on free content? Some of my promos would target the wealthy retirees, too.